|
MOTHER
JOAN OF THE ANGELS
DVD.
Second Run
This
new DVD issue of Mother Joan of the Angels is
neatly timed, coming on the heels of the BFI’s release of
Ken Russell’s The Devils. For this film
is based on the same incident that inspired Russell’s film
– the alleged possession of a convent-load of nuns in Loudon
– but picks up the story after the events shown in Russell’s
film.
This film follows the arrival of Father Josef Suryn (Mieczyslaw
Voit) at the convent – here relocated to a sparse Polish
countryside, where the only other signs of life (and death) are
an inn just outside the convent walls and the stake where Father
Grandier (or Garniec as he is named here) was burned alive. His
mission is to exorcise Mother Joan (Lucyna Winnicka), who has
been identified as being at the centre of the possession –
four priests already in attendance are dealing with the other
nuns. However, he soon finds himself subject to the same unnatural
pressures – be they from the Devil or from the pressures
of living such a cloistered life – that have affected the
nuns, and an attraction between the priest and the nun he is here
to cleanse begins to develop.
Jerzy Kawalerowicz’s 1961 film, shot in crisp black and
white in a series of mostly static, long and wide scenes, naturally
lacks the excesses that Russell was free to indulge in a decade
later, but the sense of restraint is fitting here, reflecting
as it does the unspoken desires of the central characters, and
the overly-restrictive world that they inhabit. Each deals with
it in their own way – Sister Joan with her ‘possession’
that conveniently frees her and the other nuns from their religious
shackles (notably, the only nun not ‘possessed’ is
the one willing to break the rules and sneak down to the inn),
and Father Josef with his self-flagellation – a masturbation
substitute here and in real life.
It’s impossible not to see parallels here with Russell’s
film – and, indeed, with The Exorcist,
a much less ambiguous tale of possession and redemption. Certainly,
Kawalerowicz’s scenes of possession offer up visual foreshadows
of the scenes that those two films could expand on – the
hysteria, here more restrained but equally unsettling, the voyeuristic
audience making the exorcisms into more of a public performance
than a religious rite, with both priests and nuns playing their
parts on cue… and the idea of the priest taking on the possession
to excuse his own failings. In the end, his faith has been challenged,
but not extinguished – despite the horror of the final moments,
this is still a man who believed in his God. He just accepts that
God is responsible for creating the evil as well ad the good.
With startling central performances, astonishing visuals (beautifully
presented in this restored edition) and an erotic charge that
is subtle yet omnipresent, this is astonishing stuff. Pioneering
work of nunsploitation and a fine work of art – if you are
a fan of Russell’s work, this will be an intriguing supplement
to the story.
DAVID
FLINT
BUY
IT NOW (UK)
|